• November 2019 Membership Meeting

  • Legislative 2020 Session

     A Legislative Look Ahead and Practitioners Perspectives

    Speakers, Republican, Democrat and Lobbyist, generally agreed, that education will be one of the issues that rises to the top of the agenda in the next legislative session.  But for those of you who missed the remarks from Sen. Heather Carter, Sen. Martin Quezada, Rep. T.J. Shope, Rep. Reginald Bolding, Marcus Dell’Artino (First Strategic Communications & Public Affairs), Chris Kotterman (Arizona School Boards Association), Greg Patterson (former member Arizona Board of Regents), and Lourdes Pena (Triadvocates) they agreed on many key points.

  •  

  •  

    Point One, it is an election year and all members will likely be voting along strict party lines when it comes to the money issues.  If a budget item needs more than 31 votes in the House, it is unlikely to get it!  This more than begs the question that any referral on education finance is challenged from the get go if the hope is that it be bi-partisan.

  •  

    Point Two, Members demonstrated tremendous civility in Friday’s remarks, and many of those attending took heart that at the core of our discussions, everyone recognizes the need to have good will to get anything done.  But that obvious common denominator was again tempered by the reality that doing the work of the state will get done, especially in producing a budget, but the chance of that budget finding bi-partisan support is very small in either the House or the Senate.  Expect, however, that non-budget items may indeed demonstrate bi-partisanship.

    Point Three, even though the school capital funding lawsuit is about to go to trial, Members have not yet received any particular briefings on its scope, content or more detail on plaintiff or defendant positions.

  •  

  •  

    Point Four, the lobbyist panel provided tremendous insights into the legislative process and it is important to remember that even though a lobbyist may not have a specific, education related client, the budget impacts and the ancillary connections to one another make the education debates a very hearty and heavily traveled road.  Expect many voices in the room with various valid interests.  Both business and education lobbyists agreed on all major subject areas that will be addressed including education, significant needs in water reform, corrections reform and transportation to occupy much of the legislative airspace.

    Point Five, so deftly described by ASBA’s Chris Kotterman, (and I paraphrase) the legislative process can now be summarized in 6 numbers.  1-0-5-1-0-8.  In other words, Proposition 105, the so-called Voter Protection Act passed by voters as a Constitutional Amendment in 1998, has prohibited the Arizona legislature from changing anything in a voter approved initiative unless by super majority vote it actually furthers the original intent.  Proposition 108, the Two Thirds Vote Requirement passed in 1974 limits the passage of any legislation that increases taxes to a two thirds vote for approval.  Combined, the Arizona Legislature has been effectively limited in its impacts on budgets, spending and taxation to these rigid constrictions.  It is nearly impossible to pass a bill with new taxes or increased revenues, and without the ability to amend the voter approved 105, 108 has effectively nearly eliminated legislative ability to raise taxes regardless of purpose.

    We hope to see you at the next ABEC meeting and welcome your attendance, comments and recommendations for future discussions!